State of the Art Oncology in EuropeFont: aaa

Childhood Medulloblastoma – 2015



1.1 Incidence

Among all the childhood central nervous system (CNS) tumours, medulloblastoma and other neuroectodermal tumours (International Classification of Disease for Oncology – ICD-O codes 9470/3–9474/3) account for 45% of all CNS cases in children (RARECAREnet). The European annual incidence rate was 6.8 per million children (age: 0-14 years) for the period 2000-2007, with high rates in Southern and Central Europe (RARECAREnet). Incidence was significantly higher in boys than in girls (about 40%). The annual incidence rate was higher in children between 1 and 9 years of age, slightly less than 8 per million; it was lower in infants (6 per million), and the lowest in 10-14-age children (4 per million) (Peris-Bonet 2006). Rising incidence was recorded for medulloblastoma during the period 1978-1997, by 1.3% on average (Peris-Bonet 2006).

1.2 Survival

In European children with a medulloblastoma diagnosed in the period 2000-2007, 1-, 3- and 5 years survival figures were 81%, 63% and 56%. Infants had a worst prognosis: 5-year survival was 33%, slightly better for children aged 1-4 years (47%), while prognosis was significantly better (67%) for the age group 5-14 years (Gatta 2014). Survival remained stable during the period 1999-2007 (Gatta 2014), while it improved during the end of Nineties: the risk of dying reduced significantly by 30% (Gatta 2009). Standard of care treatment for children older than 3 years entails surgical resection, craniospinal irradiation, and chemotherapy that has resulted in an overall cure rate, in clinical setting, of approximately 70-75% (Lannering 2012; Packer 2013). Outcome varied across European Countries, suggesting difficulty to access to effective treatment and/or to reach timely and correct diagnosis. Actually, 5-year survival was better in Northern Europe (64%) and lowest in Eastern (53%) European Countries.

1.3 Risk factors

The peak of incidence of medulloblastoma/PNET occurs during childhood; therefore, factors operating very early in life might play a key role. Birth weight has often been suggested to be a rough but easy indicator of prenatal exposures. Harder et al. conducted a systematic review on the association between birth weight and risk of specific histologic types of primary brain tumours. For medulloblastoma, high birth weight was significantly associated with increased risk (odds ratio– OR: 1.27; 95%CI 1.02-1.60) (Harder 2008). Several studies have speculated on a potential infectious aetiology. A case control study in England evaluated various perinatal factors and their impact on childhood brain tumour. The Authors found that the children of mother who had a documented viral infection during pregnancy had 11-fold increased risk of malignant nervous system tumour (Fear 2001). A further large population-based case-control study investigated the patterns of day care and social contacts in the first year of life, as well as other markers of infectious exposure. Children reported to have had no social contact with other infants in the first year of life displayed an increased risk of developing a medulloblastoma (OR: 1.78; 95%CI 1.12–2.83) (Harding 2009). However, other proxy markers of infectious exposure that were analysed (i.e., bedroom sharing, domestic exposure to school-age children, and birth order) did not support the hypothesis of a protective effect of infectious exposure. The role of diet, both as a risk and as a protective factor, has been investigated in several studies. Among the most extensively studied hypotheses is that maternal dietary intake of N-nitroso compounds (NOC) and NOC precursors during pregnancy increases brain tumor risk in offspring (Dietrich 2005). Cured meats are a major source of dietary NOC. Maternal dietary was investigated in a large international collaborative case-control study on childhood brain tumours to evaluate associations between histology-specific risk and consumption of specific food groups during pregnancy. Foods generally associated with increased risk were cured meats, eggs/dairy, and oil products; foods generally associated with decreased risk were yellow-orange vegetables, fresh fish, and grains. However, cured meat was not associated with medulloblastoma. An increased risk was found between medulloblastoma and oil products (OR: 1.5; 95%CI 1.0-2.2 for 4th vs. 1st quartile; p trend =0.005) (Pogoda 2009). A large Canadian study (Li 2009) examined the contribution of maternal occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) shortly before and during pregnancy on the incidence of childhood brain tumours. A significantly increased risk was observed for astroglial tumours as well as for all childhood brain tumours, but no association was specifically assessed for medulloblastoma/PNET. Several epidemiological investigations have attempted to evaluate the association between parental exposure to pesticide and childhood brain tumours, with the majority reporting positive associations (Baldwin 2004). In a recent population-based case-control study, the association between the occurrence of brain cancer in children and parental exposure to pesticides in occupational and residential settings was evaluated. The authors observed little association with PNET for any of the pesticide classes or exposure sources considered (Shim 2009). A further study, that investigated the association between father’s hobbies and medulloblastoma/PNET (MB/PNET), found an increase risk of MB/PNET in children from the household exposures from hobbies, particularly pesticides. In multivariate analyses, a significant association was seen for lawn care with pesticides (during pregnancy: : 1.6; 95%CI 1.0-2.5 – after birth: OR: 1.8; 95%CI 1.2-2.8) (Rosso 2008). Considering parental occupation, a European study found an elevated risk of PNET with parental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) (OR: 2.0; 95%CI 1.0-4.0) and high maternal exposure to solvent (OR: 3.2; 95%CI 1.0-10.3) during the five-year period before birth (Cordier 1997). While some genetic disorders (i.e., Gorlin syndrome, Turcot syndrome, Li-Fraumeni syndrome) are associated with an increased risk of medulloblastoma (Villani 2012).


The 2007 WHO classification of CNS tumours recognises the classic medulloblastomas and the following four variants:

  • desmoplastic/nodular;
  • medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity (MBEN);
  • anaplastic;
  • large cell (Giangaspero 2007).

Of these variants, the anaplastic and large-cell medulloblastomas show a certain degree of overlapping and they have been grouped as large-cell/anaplastic (LCA) medulloblastomas in several studies (Gilbertson 2008). The frequency of the combined LCA form varies from 10% to 22%. Nodular/desmoplastic medulloblastoma and MBEN comprise approximately 7% and 3% of all medulloblastomas, respectively. Classic tumours constitute the remainder (McManamy 2007). Classic medulloblastoma is composed of densely packed cells with round-to-oval or carrot-shaped hyperchromatic nuclei surrounded by scanty cytoplasm. Desmoplastic/nodular medulloblastoma is a variant that contains nodular, reticulin-free zones, or “pale islands” which represent zones of neuronal maturation, exhibits a reduced nuclear cytoplasmic ratio, a fibrillary matrix, and uniform cells with a neurocytic appearance. These nodules are surrounded by densely packed mitotically active cells, which produce a dense intercellular reticulin-positive network of fibres. Medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity (MBEN) occurs in infants and it is associated with a good prognosis. It differs from the related nodular/desmoplastic variant by having an expanded lobular architecture, due to the fact that the reticulin-free zones become unusually elongated and rich in neuropil-like tissue. Such zones contain a population of small cells with round nuclei, which resemble the cells of a central neurocytoma and exhibit a streaming pattern. The internodular component is markedly reduced in some areas.
The large cell medulloblastoma is composed of monomorphic cells with large, round, vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli and variably abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. Groups or sheets of these “large cells” tend to mix with cells that have a different morphology characterised by marked nuclear pleomorphism and nuclear moulding. The latter phenotype has been labelled as “anaplastic” (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Anaplastic (large cell) medulloblastoma.

childhood medulloblastoma_figure1
Large cell and anaplastic medulloblastomas show considerable cytological overlap. Histological progression over time, from non-anaplastic to anaplastic types, has been described in several studies, and a transition can be even observed within a single tumour, as inferred from the presence of differing degrees of cytological atypia or anaplasia in one tumour (Eberhart 2002).
Clinical data strongly indicate a favourable prognosis for the nodular/desmoplastic medulloblastoma (Rutkowski 2005). Moreover, comparing the outcome of classic and LCA medulloblastomas, a significantly worse prognosis is evident for the LCA variant (McManamy 2003; McManamy 2007; Massimino 2013b).
The advent of molecular diagnostics has allowed medulloblastoma to be classified into distinct groups. According to the current international consensus, there are four molecular groups of medulloblastoma: wingless (WNT), sonic hedgehog (SHH), Group 3, and Group 4 (Figure 2) (Kool 2012; Taylor 2012).

Figure 2. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma. (Source: Taylor 2012)

Figure 2

2.1 WNT medulloblastoma

This is the least common group of medulloblastoma, accounting for 11% of all cases (Kool 2012). WNT medulloblastomas can occur at all ages, but predominantly affect older children, with a peak incidence in the age group 10-12 years, and are rarely observed in infants. Gender ratio is equal, with a female preponderance, unlike the other subgroups. The tumours are typically located in the midline of the brain, occupying the IV ventricle and infiltrating the brain stem (Gajjar 2014).
Histologically, the majority of WNT medulloblastoma are of the classic type; however, rare examples of WNT medulloblastoma with LC/A histology have been documented, but do not seem to affect prognosis. WNT pathway tumours can be reliably identified by IHC expression of DKK1, Filamin-A, YAP-1, and beta-catenin (nuclear +/- cytoplasmic expression) (Ellison 2011). Metastatic diffusion is much lower, compared to other groups. Prognosis in this group is the best of all four groups, with survival rates around 95-100%. The reasons for improved survival in this group is not known, but could be related to increased sensitivity to radiotherapy (Salaroli 2015). In the WNT group, over 75% of tumours harbour a point mutation in exon 3 of the CTNNB1 gene (encoding beta-catenin), leading to hyper-activation of the WNT pathway by rendering beta-catenin resistant to degradation and causing nuclear accumulation of the protein with increased transcription of genes involved in cellular proliferation including cyclin D1 and MYC (Gilbertson 2004). Cytogenetically, WNT pathway tumours are characterised by deletion of one copy of chromosome 6 (monosomy 6) in the majority of patients (42 of 53 tumours; 79%) (Shih 2014). Other than monosomy 6, the genome of WNT medulloblastoma is relatively silent and associated with only very few regions of chromosomal gain and/or loss across the genome (Northcott 2012).
Copy number variation (CNV) and/or single nucleotide variants (SNV) include (in addition to monosomy 6) mutations in the DEAD-box RNA helicase gene that enhances cellular proliferation by increasing the trans activating capacity of beta-catenin, SMARCB4 (26%), TP53 mutation (16% of cases, without a corresponding germline mutation; it does not seem to affect the excellent prognosis of this group), tetraploidy (14% of tumours; it might be an early event in tumorigenesis), and MLL2 mutations (2%) (Northcott 2012;  Jones 2012).

2.2 SHH medulloblastoma

The SHH pathway plays a key role in normal cerebellar development where it induces proliferation of neuronal precursor cells in the developing cerebellum and other tissues. The SHH ligand is normally secreted by Purkinje cells and promotes formation of the external germinal layer from granule cell precursor (GCP) cells (Gilbertson 2008). Paracrine signalling from Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) or constitutional activation due to PTCH1 mutations results in dissociation of the serpentine G-protein coupled receptor SMO from PTCH, which then translocates into the tip of the primary cilium and releases GLI2 from its natural repressor, suppressor, of fused homolog (SUFU). GLI2 then migrates into the nucleus and transcriptionally activates genes involved in cellular proliferation of GCP of the cerebellum leading to tumour formation (Archer 2012). SHH subgroup accounts for about 30% of all medulloblastomas and has a bimodal age distribution, occurring mostly in infants (<3 years) and adults (>16 years), and less frequently in patients who are 3-16 years old (Taylor 2012). The gender ratio is about 1:1, although there is a slight male predominance among infants (Gajjar 2014). SHH medulloblastoma frequently occur in a hemispheric location in the cerebellum (Figure 3), although some tumours arise in the midline vermis (Gibson 2010). Histology is typically of the nodular/desmoplastic type with MBEN being exclusively classified into this group. The others are either of classic or LC/A histology. SHH medulloblastomas can be identified readily using tumour IHC expression for GAB1, SFRP, and GLI1 protein (Ellison 2011). Metastatic disease at diagnosis occurs in about 17% of cases. As previously mentioned, about 3-5% of patients with Gorlin syndrome and germline PTCH1 mutation exclusively develop nodular/desmoplastic medulloblastoma.

Figure 3. SHH medulloblastoma.

childhood medulloblastoma_figure4
PTCH1mutations have been reported in 36-54% of SHH medulloblastoma, making it the most prevalent mutation of this group (Kool 2014). The identification of somatic mutations of PTCH1 in non-Gorlin patients further established the link between medulloblastoma and SHH signalling, including mutations in SMO and SUFU, amplifications of SHH, GLI2, and MYCN genes. In a recent large-scale genomic study of SHH medulloblastoma, PTCH1 mutation occurred at a roughly equal frequency in infants (36%), children (42%), and adults (54%). SUFU mutations were found almost exclusively in infants, and SMO mutations were enriched in tumours occurring in adults (Kool 2014).
In older children, SHH medulloblastomas have a broader molecular heterogeneity, with amplification of SHH, GLI2, and MYCN. Zhukova et al. reported that TP53 mutations enriched in tumours of older children with sonic hedge hog (SHH) medulloblastoma (21% of cases), and over 50% were found to have germline mutations and, hence, LFS that conferred a significantly worse prognosis (Zhukova 2013). Copy number aberrations include amplifications of protein phosphatase ID (PPM1D, chromosome 17q23.2), IGF1R, IRS2, PIK3C2G, PIK3C2B, and YAP-1 along with PTEN deletion on chromosome 10q23.31 and mutations in DDX3X (11%) (Northcott 2012). Tetraploidy is present in about 29% of samples and it is associated with p53 mutations and chromothripsis (Jones 2012). Patients in this group have an intermediate prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival of approximately 75% when treated with standard therapy (Taylor 2012). Recent studies have shown that GLI2 amplification, chromosome 14 loss, 10q deletion, MYCN amplification, anaplasia, and/or metastatic disease at diagnosis as conferring the worst prognosis for patients with SHH medulloblastoma (Shih 2014).

2.3 Group 3 medulloblastoma

Group 3 medulloblastoma accounts for about 25-28% of cases and it is exclusively found in children, with a male predominance, and has a high incidence of metastatic disease at diagnosis and frequently LC/A histology (Northcott 2012).
No germline mutations have been described to predispose children to group 3 medulloblastoma and little is known about its molecular pathogenesis. While IHC expression for Natriuretic Peptide Receptor 3 (NPR3) has been reported to confirm this subgroup, others have questioned the validity of this marker, which should not be routinely used for clinical purposes until further validation in prospective cohorts of newly diagnosed patients (Taylor 2012; Min 2013).
Focal high-level amplification of MYC and OTX-2 proto-oncogenes are observed in approximately 12-16% and 7% of these tumours, respectively, and most have aberrant Myc expression (Northcott 2012). The genome in group 3 medulloblastoma is highly unstable and frequent gains of 1q, 7, and 17q (i17q) are observed along with 10q, 11, 16q, and 17p deletions (Northcott 2012). Tetraploidy is seen in 54% of group 3 tumours and probably occurs as an early event in tumorigenesis (Jones 2012). Chromothripsis (in the absence of p53 mutations) frequently occurs in this malignancy, resulting in bizarre chromosomal rearrangements or fusions in an attempt at ineffective DNA repair. There also appears to be up regulation of TGF-β signalling due to single copy number aberration of the genes in this signalling pathway and interaction with downstream targets that include OTX-2 (Northcott 2012). This subgroup is associated with the worst prognosis amongst all four molecular groups of medulloblastoma with survival of <50%, with no survivors past 120 months of follow-up in evaluation of retrospective cohorts (Kool 2012). In a multivariate analysis, Shih et al. showed that the presence of i17q, Myc amplification, and presence of metastatic disease confer the worst prognosis in this group, and those without these markers fare relatively better (Shih 2014). In testing novel agents in this pre-clinical model of group 3 medulloblastoma, Pei et al. have shown that these tumours are sensitive to PI3 kinase and mTOR inhibitors (Pei 2012). Similarly, the group at St. Jude Children’s Hospital, using a high-throughput cell-based assay to treat Group 3 medulloblastoma neurospheres, identified pemetrexed and gemcitabine to selectively inhibit proliferation of this tumour type both in vitro and in vivo and in combination with standard therapies; it might be a promising treatment for children with group 3 medulloblastoma (Morfouace 2014).

2.4 Group 4 medulloblastoma

Group 4 is the commonest molecular group of medulloblastoma, accounting for about 35%. This tumour type can affect all ages, but it is rare in infants. There is a significant male predominance (3:1) (Northcott 2012). Histologically, the vast majority of Group 4 medulloblastoma are of classic histology, although cases of LC/A have been observed. KCNA1 has been suggested as an IHC marker for Group 4, but it is awaiting validation (Taylor 2012). Patients in this group have an intermediate prognosis with conventional cytotoxic therapy. Recently, Shih et al. have identified that loss of chromosome 11 and presence of i17q in a subset of patients with group 4 medulloblastoma confer an excellent prognosis irrespective of metastatic disease (Shih 2014). The underlying biology of Group 4 medulloblastoma is not well understood. Similarly to group 3 tumours, tetraploidy occurs as an early change (40% of cases) (Jones 2012). Additionally, genes MYCN and CDK6 (cyclin dependent kinase 6) are commonly amplified. Isochromosome 17q occurs in 80% of cases, as does 17p deletion. Most group 4 tumours in females lose one copy of the X chromosome, which raises the possibility of the existence of one or more tumour suppressor genes on this chromosome (Northcott 2012). Additionally, chromatin-remodelling genes are mutated in this group and include KDM6A (that codes for a H3K27 methylase and located on chromosome Xp11.3), ZYMYM3, and CHD7. These mutations, along with overexpression of enhancer of Zeste homologue 2 (EZH2), keep neural stem cells in an undifferentiated state and might be sustaining tumorigenesis.


The differential diagnosis of tumours located in the posterior fossa includes medulloblastoma, cerebellar astrocytoma, ependymoma, brainstem glioma, and atypical theratoid/rhabdoid tumour. Computerised tomography (CT) is sometimes the first-line neuroimaging modality for patients with posterior fossa tumours because of its availability in an emergency setting. A typical feature of medulloblastoma seen with CT is a midline, homogeneous, contrast-enhancing cerebellar vermian mass. MRI is, however, a mandatory follow-on imaging, that should be carried out before tumour surgery. MRI features that are typical of medulloblastoma include a heterogeneous hypointense mass on T1-weighted imaging. In contrast to other CNS tumours that show T2-weighted hyperintensity compared with grey matter, medulloblastomas are intermediate between grey and white matter. Contrast enhancement of medulloblastomas is usually heterogeneous. Spinal metastases, which occur in up to 40% of patients, are most commonly seen in the lumbosacral and thoracic areas and are best seen on post-contrast T1-weighted images. In doubtful cases, they should be confirmed or excluded by axial slices. It is therefore imperative to have an MRI of the spine before starting any adjuvant treatment. Whole CNS imaging should be repeated before defined phases of postoperative treatment (Buhring 2002) as a standard procedure.
Medulloblastoma can be disseminated at diagnosis, and sometimes occurs in the brain with a particular predisposition for subependymal areas of the ventricles. Other imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), PET, and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), can be helpful to distinguish tumour recurrence from post-therapy necrosis. These imaging modalities might have substantial implications for the future directions of research into medulloblastoma. However, these evaluations are to be considered still investigational.


Staging and subsequent risk stratification are crucial in the management of medulloblastoma. Current staging classification requires MRI of the brain and entire spine with and without gadolinium and analysis of the cerebro-spinal-fluid (CSF). CSF from the lumbar region is preferred, because it is a more sensitive medium than ventricular fluid for detecting disseminated disease. CSF should be obtained postoperatively from the lumbar region 2 weeks after surgery to avoid a false-positive cytology after the initial resection (Gajjar 1999).
Contraindications for lumbar puncture (e.g., increased intracranial pressure) must be considered cautiously. Assessment of the CSF for disseminated disease is crucial, because up to 10% of adults and 30% of children have evidence of disseminated disease at presentation.
Traditionally, MB patients are stratified into standard and high-risk groups for therapy according to the clinical presentation, depending on the presence of metastases (M1-M4) or residual disease >1.5 cm2, according to North American stratification, as determined by early (within 24-72 hours) post-operative MRI (Packer 2003a). The type of risk group for an MB patient is determined according to Chang’s classification for metastases (Table 1) (Chang 1969).

Table 1. Chang classification for metastases.


M0 No gross nodular or laminar subarachnoid or haematogenous metastasis
M1 Microscopic tumour cells in the cerebrospinal fluid
M2 Gross nodular or laminar seeding in the cerebellum, cerebral subarachnoid space, or in the third or fourth ventricles
M3 Gross nodular or laminar seeding in the spinal subarachnoid space
M4 Extra-neuraxial metastasis

Patients are generally divided into risk-stratified schemes on the basis of their age, the extent of residual disease, and dissemination (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Classification of patients by risk.

childhood medulloblastoma_figure2
Sixty to 70% of patients older than 3 years are assigned to the average-risk group. High-risk patients include people in the disseminated category, and patients who have less than a gross or near-total resection, which is arbitrarily defined as 1.5 cm2 of postoperative residual disease (Figure 5). Histologically, LC/A are associated with a poorer outcome compared to classic or desmoplastic tumours.

Figure 5. A near-total resection.

childhood medulloblastoma_figure3
Tumour staging will be probably implemented in forthcoming trials through integration with biological findings that have been found in retrospective series to correlate with outcome, such as proteins or genes encoding MYC, beta-catenin, and p-53 (Northcott 2012).


Today, current treatment protocols that include surgery, craniospinal irradiation, and chemotherapy have achieved 5-year overall survival rates over 70% for standard-risk patients (Packer 2003a).
Until a few years ago, metastatic medulloblastoma series reported dismal results with 5-year survival around 30-50% (Evans 1990). Nowadays, intensified chemotherapy regimens (myeloablative schedules with hematopoietic support of peripheral harvested stem cells) and non-conventional radiotherapy schedules seem to have improved prognosis – with 5-year survival rates around 70% – that will need to be confirmed in further trials (Gajjar 2006; Gandola 2009; Dufour 2014).
Similar considerations can be applied to younger children (under 3 or 4-5 years of age at diagnosis, according to national policies) who have traditionally been treated with risk- and age-adapted radiotherapy – frequently reducing total craniospinal doses – and prolonged chemotherapy schedules with the aim of reducing late sequelae, especially those related to radiation treatment, and therefore reducing the risk of relapse and intensive re-treatment for around 50% of patients (Duffner 1993; Grill 2005). The most recent German experience, using systemic chemotherapy schedule combined with intraventricular methotrexate, has resulted in a 5-year progression free survival of 83% (Rutkowski 2005), thus demonstrating that a tailored use of drugs is able to replace radiotherapy, at least in some sub-groups of patients.


Current and currently planned clinical trials will aim at both improving prognosis and reducing treatment sequelae by:

  1. evaluating the feasibility of reducing both the dose of craniospinal irradiation and the volume of the posterior fossa radiotherapy boost by the new knowledge on biological stratification factors in standard-risk patients;
  2. determining whether intensification of chemotherapy or irradiation can improve outcome in patients with newly-defined high-risk disease.

Future patients will be enrolled in clinical trials that will identify the risk based on both clinical factors and molecular grouping of this tumour in real time, allowing for de-escalation of therapy for patients with low or average-risk disease and treatment intensification for patients with high-risk tumours.

6.1 Surgery

Surgical resection is a fundamental part of treatment. Depending on the location and dimensions of the tumour, an external ventricular shunt or third ventriculostomy might be needed as emergency treatment, before tumour resection, to decrease intracranial pressure secondary to fluid circulation obstruction at the foramina of Lukscha, foramina of Magendie, or the aqueduct of Sylvius. About 20-30% of patients will require a permanent ventriculo-peritoneal shunt consequent to scarring of the cerebro-spinal fluid pathways. The close relationship of medulloblastoma to the fourth ventricle and sometimes brainstem is a risk for morbidity, but expert paediatric neurosurgeons are frequently able to remove the tumour gross totally without creating major morbidity, on a type 3 level of evidence (Albright 2000). Apart from infections and mechanical complications, such as fluid leak and pseudomeningocele, direct neurosurgical manipulation can cause posterior fossa mutism syndrome (Robertson 2006). This is characterised by mutism developing 48-72 hours after resection, and it is associated with severe cerebellar deficits such as dysmetria, hypotonia, paresis, and mood depression, which can last several months. It is probably secondary to disruption of reticular substance pathways.
The degree of surgical resection is best assessed on a post-operative MRI brain (within 48 hours after surgery). However, a small amount of tumour, visible to the operating surgeon’s eyes, is below the limits of resolution of current scanners and can be left behind, and a careful discussion with the neurosurgeon and a review of the operative report is important in treatment planning.

6.2 Standard risk patients

After surgical resection, the mainstay for patients older than 3 years at diagnosis is “reduced-dose” craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with a total dose of 23.4 Gy plus a localised boost to the posterior fossa up to a total dose of 54-55.8 Gy. This is usually combined with weekly concurrent single-drug (vincristine) and followed by a multidrug regimen that can be cisplatin, vincristine and lomustine, or cisplatin, vincristine and cyclophosphamide, on a type 1 level of evidence (Packer 1990; Packer 2006). Five-year event-free survival based on this regimen is over 80%.
The clinical target volume (CTV) for CSI includes the whole brain and spinal cord including meninges down to the thecal sac at L5 or S3 level. Inadequate coverage of the cribriform plate region can result in sub-frontal relapse following CSI; hence treatment planning should adequately include this region without causing undue radiation exposure to the eye globes and a subsequent risk of cataracts (Halperin 1994). In recent years, CT and MRI scans have been increasingly used to plan the target volumes for irradiation. The planning axial CT scan image is obtained through the treatment area of the brain with the patient in a customised immobilization device.
A further reduction of craniospinal irradiation dose under 23.4 Gy of posterior fossa boost dimensions is currently under evaluation in a randomised Children oncology group (COG) study, and it will be also studied in a subset of standard-risk patients with WNT subgroup disease under 16 years of age who will be treated in the recently open European SIOP PNET 5 trial. The HIT-SIOP PNET4 trial, conducted and closed in Europe (Lannering 2012), compared conformal conventionally fractionated craniospinal radiotherapy at a dose of 23.4 Gy plus boost with hyperfractionated craniospinal irradiation (2 x 1 Gy/d) at a dose of 36 Gy plus boost, followed by the same chemotherapy schedule with 8 courses of vincristine (1.5 mg/m2 for 3 doses), cisplatin (70 mg/m2) and lomustine (75 mg/m2). The aims of this randomised trial were to compare progression-free-survival and late effects after the two different radiation schedules. Hyperfractionated radiation is a technique that, at least theoretically, can achieve increased tumour cell kill with equal effects on critical normal tissues, or reduce normal tissue effects without reduction of tumour cell kill.
In all, 340 children aged 4 to 21 years from 122 European centres were post-operatively staged and randomly assigned to one of the two arms. After a median follow-up of 4.8 years (range 0.1-8.3 years), survival rates were not significantly different between the two treatment arms:

  • 5-year EFS was 77% ± 4% in the conventional radiation group and 78% ± 4% in the hyperfractionated radiotherapy group;
  • corresponding 5-year OS was 87% ± 3% and 85% ± 3%, respectively.

A postoperative residual tumour of more than 1.5 cm2 was the strongest negative prognostic factor. EFS of children with all reference assessments and no large residual tumour was 82% ± 2% at 5 years.
Patients with a delay of more than 7 weeks from the beginning of RT had a worse prognosis.
Severe hearing loss was not significantly different for the two treatment arms at follow-up. In this large randomised European study, which enrolled patients with standard-risk medulloblastoma from more than 100 centres, excellent survival rates were achieved in patients without a large postoperative residual tumour and without RT treatment delays. EFS and OS for HFRT were not superior to STRT, which therefore remains standard of care in this disease.

6.2.1 High-risk group patients

As already mentioned in the «Staging» section, patients are stratified for therapy into standard and high-risk groups according to their clinical presentation, depending on the presence of metastases alone (M1-M4) or with postoperative residual disease >1.5cm2. The prognosis for high-risk medulloblastoma is still unsatisfactory. Ever since the 1980’s, when medulloblastoma, whether high-risk or not, has been treated with a protocol including radiation therapy and chemotherapy (vincristine and CCNU), patients had a better prognosis if they received chemotherapy (Tait 1990; Evans 1990). Chemotherapy is therefore part of adjuvant treatment in this group of patients, on a type 1 level of evidence, but optimal timing and schedule are not yet established.
A single centre study considering the use of RT followed by vincristine, cisplatin, and CCNU in high-risk patients reported a survival rate of around 85% (Packer 1988). In a SIOP (International Society of Paediatric Oncology) trial, open from 1984 to 1989 and published with a 76-month follow-up, 27 metastatic patients treated with standard-dose RT followed by CCNU and vincristine obtained a 5-year PFS of 43% (Bailey 1995). These results were comparable to the SFOP (French Society of Paediatric Oncology) study, which treated high-risk patients with the “eight-drugs-in-one-day” chemotherapy regimen, followed by two cycles of high-dose MTX, RT and then further “eight in one” chemotherapy (Gentet 1995). The subsequent French national study confirmed the rate of response to the “sandwich” chemotherapy, but was without any significant improvement in either M1 or M2/M3 patients, who achieved a 5-year EFS of 58.8% and 43.1%, respectively (Verlooy 2006). The Children’s Cancer Group 921 randomised phase III trial, open from 1986 to 1992, also proposed an “eight-in-one” chemotherapy regimen before and after RT. The 83 metastatic patients had a significantly lower PFS than the standard-risk patients (57% M1; 40% M2; 78% NED/M0, p = 0.0006) (Zeltzer 1999). In the randomised prospective multi-centre trial HIT ‘91, post-operative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ifosfamide, etoposide, IV high-dose methotrexate, cisplatin and cytarabine given in two cycles) followed by craniospinal RT was compared to maintenance chemotherapy after immediate postoperative RT (“Philadelphia protocol”). The 3-year PFS for all randomised patients was 65% for M1 patients and 30% for M2-M3 patients, thus achieving a statistically significant difference (Kortmann 2000).
More recent studies have produced encouraging results with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Strother et al. enrolled 19 patients with metastases for treatment with topotecan, followed by CSI and four cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide with cisplatin and vincristine, followed by CPC reinfusion. The PFS 2 years after starting the therapy was 73.7% ± 10.5% (Strother 2001). This experience was expanded, treating a total of 42 metastatic patients, and obtaining a 5-year EFS of 66% (Gajjar 2006). A preliminary study was conducted on 9 patients with supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumours and metastatic medulloblastoma treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide with cisplatin, vincristine, etoposide and high-dose MTX for 2-3 cycles before radiotherapy. The results were interesting: 7/9 patients were tumour-free after a median follow-up of 27 months (Dhodapkar 2002). In a more recent trial, open from 1997 to 2003, 21 young patients with high-risk or disseminated medulloblastoma were enrolled for evaluation of their response rate to an intensified induction chemotherapy regimen and single myeloablative chemotherapy cycle with autologous stem-cell rescue. This was followed by RT for patients more than six years of age, or with evidence of residual disease on completion of the induction chemotherapy if under 6 years old. The 3-year EFS and OS were 49% and 60%, respectively (Chi 2004).
The European phase III clinical trial SIOP/UKCCSG PNET-3 ascertained the feasibility of treating high-risk medulloblastoma with neoadjuvant CT (vincristine, cisplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide), followed by a standard CSI dose with a posterior fossa boost and/or a boost to metastases. The outcome was rather unsatisfactory in metastatic patients in comparison with earlier multi-institutional series, obtaining a 5-year PFS of less than 40% (Taylor 2005).
Gandola et al. (Gandola 2009) have recently reported on 33 consecutive patients, treated in an almost monoinstitutional setting, receiving post-operative methotrexate (8 g/m²) plus vincristine, etoposide (2.4 g/m²), cyclophosphamide (4 g/m²), and carboplatin (0.8 g/m²) in a 2-month schedule. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) was then delivered at a total dose to the neuraxis of 39 Gy (1.3 Gy/fraction, 2 fractions/day) with a posterior fossa boost up to 60 Gy (1.5 Gy/fraction, 2 fractions/day). In cases of persistent disseminated disease before HART, patients were consolidated with 2 courses of myeloablative chemotherapy and circulating progenitor cell rescue. Otherwise, they received a maintenance chemotherapy with vincristine and lomustine for one year. With a median follow-up of 82 months, the 5-year EFS, PFS and OS were 70%, 72% and 73%, respectively. Dufour recently published a study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of tandem high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support followed by conventional craniospinal RT in the treatment of children older than 5 years of age with high-risk medulloblastoma (19 metastatic) or supratentorial PNET. At a median follow-up of nearly 4 years for children with metastatic MB, the EFS and OS rate at 3 years were 78% (95%CI 55-91) and 83% (95%CI 59-94), respectively, EFS and OS rate at 5 years were 72% (95%CI 48-87), and 83% (95%CI 59-94), respectively, thus supporting the statement that this approach could improve results (Dufour 2014).
The Children’s Oncology Group is currently evaluating a randomised treatment of concurrent carboplatin+vincristine plus radiotherapy (vs. radiotherapy only) followed by maintenance chemotherapy with or without 13-cis retinoic acid (an anti-apoptotic agent) in children with newly diagnosed high- risk medulloblastoma and supratentorial PNETs (Gajjar 2015, data unpublished).
None of these studies has so far provided more than a type 3 evidence concerning the contribution of high doses of craniospinal irradiation, possibly delivered through a hyperfractionated/accelerated modality, together with high-dose chemotherapy schedules to achieve better disease control. It is, therefore, desirable that wider phase 3 trials should be initiated to obtain stronger evidence. Until that time, our recommendations are to enrol these patients in controlled clinical trials, because of the dismal prognosis and the more aggressive treatment required, with accompanying acute and long-term side effects.

6.3 Treatment for younger children

In the past, the survival of infants with medulloblastoma was inferior compared to older children. Possible reasons that may explain this observation were: delay in diagnosis, increased surgical risk, increased toxicity due to RT, under-treatment,vand a potentially “more aggressive” biology. A cut-off age level of 3 years had been introduced in the mid- 1980s because strategies to delay or omit irradiation had high priority in order to reduce unacceptable sequelae (Ries 1999; Duffner 2003; Garrè 2006).
Infants have either SHH tumours, which typically have nodular/desmoplastic or MBEN D/N histology, tumour location in the cerebellar hemisphere, and a better prognosis, or group 3 tumours, which are frequently of LC/A histology, harbour MYC amplification, higher incidence of metastatic disease, and a poor prognosis (Kool 2012; Gilbertson 2004).
The severe permanent sequelae seen in long-term survivors treated with craniospinal irradiation at a young age, with or without CT, were in fact considered unacceptable. Thus trials were performed in the USA in the 1980s, and after 1985 also in Europe, using up-front CT in order to delay or to avoid RT. The MOPP protocol, which was a pioneering project, was used on 12 cases, 8 of whom became long-term survivors (Ater 1997). The first Paediatric Oncology baby protocol (POG1), which was the first large cooperative study that attempted to delay irradiation by using conventional CT, was followed by several American (Children’s Cancer Study Group – CCSG) and European cooperative studies (baby protocols of the Société Française d’Oncologie Pediatrique – SFOP, of the Italian Association for Paediatric Oncology – AIEOP, and of the German Society of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology – GPOH; HIT-SKK ‘87 study) (Duffner 2003; Duffner 1999; Grill 2005; Rutkowski 2009). The POG1 study required children< 2 years of age to be treated with CT for 2 years, while children who were two to three years of age were treated for 1 year. Both groups were eligible for RT at the end of CT. Sixty-two cases were recruited. Event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 30% and 69%, respectively. Radical resection was a favourable prognostic factor, as 69% of M0/T0 cases became long-term survivors (13 cases) (Duffner 1999).
The CCSG study tested the “8 in 1” protocol. After a median follow-up of 6 years, a 3-year EFS of 22% was obtained and long term survival was below 30% in M0/T0 cases (Geyer 2005). These initial studies showed that only a minority of patients with M0/T0 could be cured with conventional CT, and that the disease could not be controlled in patients with residual tumour after surgery and/or metastases. Therefore, European and American studies intensified systemic CT (POG2), while others added intraventricular CT (Germany) or high-dose systemic methotrexate (Italy – AIEOP SNC9501) (Garrè 2006). Standard CT in France (Baby SFOP Protocol) included alternating courses of carboplatin/procarbazine, etoposide/cisplatin, vincristine/cyclophosphamide for 18 months. Thirty-three out of 47 MO/TO patients progressed during/after CT, but OS was 76%. The results in metastatic cases were unsatisfactory (PFS 16%), while localised failures in M0/T0 were successfully rescued by high dose CT, with or without tre-operation, followed by focal irradiation. Neuropsychological outcome was also reported (Grill 2005).
A German study investigated intraventricular CT in 43 patients. Although this study showed no favourable impact on metastatic disease, it achieved the best known OS and EFS in M0/T0 patients without irradiation (14/17 were cured) (Rutkowski 2005). Neuropsychological outcome was better than for cases treated with CSI (Rutkowski 2009), and about the same as cases treated with systemic chemotherapy alone, or controls. Due to the limited number of cases and special aspects of using intraventricular CT, it remains to be clarified whether these data can be reproduced in a larger international co-operative study.
The introduction of sequential HDCT for relapsed patients or “up-front” for patients with metastases is currently being investigated in the 2nd generation studies, and high response rates have been reported (Dallorso 2005; Kalifa 1999; Garrè 2006). The French group has also demonstrated that reduced volumes of irradiation after HDCT contributed to long-term survival (Grill 2005; Kalifa 1999). Current and future studies should clarify whether these regimens can also increase the proportion of patients that may be cured without RT in the M0/T0 group, as well as in the high-risk group. The Italian AIEOP infant pilot study, which uses HDCT followed either by conformal RT on the residual tumour or by CSI in patients with metastases, shows that 5 year EFS in the first 20 study patients has increased (70%) with respect to previous series where standard-dose schedules were adopted (Garrè 2006; Garrè 2009).
It is still unclear whether the subset of infants that were cured in each study had peculiar biological features that favoured survival. The HIT-SKK ‘92 study analysed the impact of the histological variants and reported a high frequency of desmoplastic medulloblastoma (40%). In addition, the prognosis for desmoplastic medulloblastoma was significantly better compared with classic medulloblastoma (Rutkowski 2005). A recent single institution retrospective study reports a similar observation, confirming the high frequency of desmoplastic variants and particularly of MBEN in young ages and the high frequency of association between Gorlin Syndrome and MBEN, which was observed in 40% of cases (Garrè 2009). A recent meta-analysis of all infant studies conducted in the United States, Germany, France, Italy, and United Kingdom between 1987 and 2004 evaluated outcomes of 270 children less than 5 years of age treated on clinical protocols using different strategies (Rutkowski 2010). The 8-year EFS and OS were significantly better for infants with nodular/desmoplastic medulloblastoma (55% and 76%, respectively) as compared to those with classic (27% and 42%, respectively) or anaplastic tumours (14% and 14%, respectively). Similarly, patients with localised disease who had a complete resection of tumour (M0R0) had a significantly better outcome compared to those with incomplete resection and/or metastatic disease (M+R1). In fact, a subgroup of children with nodular/desmoplastic medulloblastoma with M0R0 disease can be cured with chemotherapy alone (Rutkowski 2005). It appears that this histologic subtype in young children is an important prognostic factor conferring a better outcome irrespective of the therapeutic approach used to treating this age group. Further prospective cooperative studies addressing these issues should be performed.
In conclusion, the treatment of infant MB has evolved (role of RT revisited and more intensive CT adopted) during the last 10-15 years, and survival rates have been improved by modern treatment strategies; recent observations seem to show that age per se is no longer an adverse prognostic factor. This is due to the impact of reserving more intensive treatment for advanced stage disease and unfavourable histology along with the presence of favourable histological variants (in up to 50% of cases).
An international phase III trial for young children with non-metastatic medulloblastoma, comparing survival rates and neurocognitive outcomes of different treatment strategies using standardised criteria, is under discussion within the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP).
Due to the higher frequency (28%) of cancer predisposition syndromes (mainly Gorlin Syndrome) in young patients (Garrè 2009; Amlashi 2003) with medulloblastoma, future trials should include guidelines for the identification of such conditions, and for genetic counselling to families. Due to the increased risk of secondary tumours and the frequency of naevoid basal-cell carcinomas in irradiated fields, every attempt should be made to avoid radiotherapy in infants when associated with Gorlin syndrome or infants who are at risk of showing it in subsequent years (if presenting with medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity).


Long-term sequelae of patients treated for medulloblastoma, including motor, sensory, endocrinological, cognitive, neuropsychological and behavioural deficits, can markedly affect their quality of life and their re-entry into school and society.
The prognostication of risk by combining information from molecular grouping, cytogenetic biomarkers, and clinical risk factors allows for therapy intensification in high-risk children to improve survival and de-escalation of treatment in those with low-risk disease so as to avoid the significant complications of therapy.
The issue of the quality of survival has to be put in every prospective trial as one of the goals of treatment amelioration.
In a recent report (Kennedy 2014), Kennedy compared quality of survival in “standard-risk” medulloblastoma after hyperfractionated craniospinal radiation therapy with the same survival after standard radiation therapy, combined with a chemotherapy regimen common to both treatment arms, that constituted the PNET4 randomised controlled trial (Lannering 2012). Data, collected through 7 participating Countries with standardised anonymised questionnaires in their own language on executive function, health status, behaviour, health-related quality of life, and medical, educational, employment, and social information, were provided by 62% of 244 eligible survivors at median interval from diagnosis of 5.8 years. The conclusion was that hyperfractionated radiation therapy was associated with better executive function and worse growth, but without accompanying change in health status, behaviour, or quality of life. A twin paper (Chevignard, in press) evaluated cognitive performance (intelligence quotient) in children and young adults in this same trial, concluding that HFRT was associated with a trend towards better verbal outcomes in children aged less than 8 years at diagnosis, but no significant differences on the other cognitive measures. Many uncertainties still remain about radiobiological assumptions and the real patients outcome.

7.1 Endocrine sequelae

The occurrence of neuro-endocrine deficiencies following craniospinal irradiation for medulloblastoma is well known. Surgically induced deficiencies manifest shortly after surgery while radiation-induced damage may manifest months to years after irradiation. For this reason long-term endocrine surveillance after craniospinal irradiation is mandatory on a type 1 level of evidence (Heikens 1998).
Radiation-induced damage is currently considered a consequence of a direct neuronal rather than vascular injury to the hypothalamus on a type 3 level of evidence (Darzy 2009). Subsequently, due to the prolonged absence of rh-GH-stimulating action, pituitary function may be affected. The hypothalamus-pituitary axis has a different radiosensitivity, with the GH axis being the most radiosensitive followed by the gonadotrophin, ACTH, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) axes.

GH deficiency (GHD). GHD is observed in 40-80% of survivors of medulloblastoma (Fossati 2009). Incidence of GHD depends on: age at radiotherapy, total dose delivered (>45 Gy), fields of radiotherapy, duration, fractions, and time after irradiation. The time interval after the end of treatment and chemotherapy are not determinant in causing GH deficiency. It worsens with time and frequently becomes irreversible. GHD may develop from 3 months to 5 years after the end of radiotherapy.
Growth screening of irradiated children includes on a type-1 level of evidence (Bull 2007): antropometric measurements (height, weight, BMI, lower segment and arm span, Tanner staging) every 6 months until growth complete and/or sexually mature, then once a year (always refer to endocrine, or at least if height/weight 2 percentile channels, growth <4-5 cm per year and/or lack of pubertal growth spurt); nutritional evaluation (every 6 months); laboratory tests (IGF-1 even if its role is debated, IGF binding protein 3, bone age determination, insulin tolerance test and GH provocative tests – sleep, exercise, arginine, clonidine, and levodopa).
Once diagnosed, the standard treatment of GHD consists of substitutive therapy with 0.18-0.3 mg/kg somatropin or 0.3 mg/kg somatrem, both daily as a standard option on a type 1 level of evidence.
Substitutive therapy is widely considered safe in terms of tumour recurrence and it can be started 1 year after completion of the oncological treatment with no evidence of further tumour growth (Rose 2003; Sklar 2002; GHRS 2000).
Three other causes of growth failure must be ruled out before starting GH replacement therapy: 1. slowing of growth during the acute phase of radiotherapy secondary to poor caloric intake; 2. poor spinal (but not limb) growth after radiation of the spine secondary to destruction of growth plates in the spine following spinal irradiation; 3. premature closure of the epiphyses due to precocious puberty.

Gonadal alterations. Gonadal alterations in children treated for medulloblastoma include: precocious puberty, delayed puberty, and hypogonadism.
Incidence depends on: age at treatment (patients treated at younger ages are less susceptible due to sufficient follicular stores) (Rutter 2007), concomitant radiochemotherapy, and radiotherapy doses. Gonadal alterations can be demonstrated after 1 year since the end of radiotherapy.
The neuro-oncological evaluation in children with possible gonadal alterations includes on a type 1 level of evidence: yearly estradiol levels assessment and pelvic ultrasonography in females, and yearly testicular volume, testosterone and β-HCG levels in males. For males and females annual height/weight assessment, LH and FSH basal and after GnRH stimulation, bone age, GH levels and Tanner stage should be monitored (Nandagopal 2008).

Precocious puberty is defined as the development of secondary sexual traits before the age of 8 years in females and 9 years in males, accompanied by rapid growth in height. This alteration often coexists with GHD (in this case, if GHD is not treated, the child will not benefit of the pubertal growth spurt reaching a short final height). Early detection of precocious puberty is mandatory in order to avoid a short final stature, on a type 1 level of evidence. The treatment of central precocious puberty consists in the administration of long-acting analogs of GnRH agonists, such as leuprolide acetate (1.88-3.75 mg/i.m. monthly) as a standard treatment option.

Delayed puberty must be considered when the patient does not show secondary sexual development by age of 14 for boys and 13 for girls. Replacement therapy might prove useful, and standard treatment options include: conjugated estrogen (0.3 mg) or ethynil estradiol (5-10 µg) orally daily for females, and testosterone enanthate (100 mg) once in every 4 weeks for males.

Other detectable alterations in survivors of paediatric medulloblastoma are: infertility and precocious menopause. Sterility is more frequent in males and it is related to alkylating agents. Before treating sexually mature boys/girls with chemotherapy or irradiation, physicians should address the possibility of infertility with patients, including fertility-preservation options and appropriate referral to reproductive specialists (Rutter 2007).

Hypothyroidism, such as altered thyroid function, during both craniospinal and cranial radiotherapy with central hypothyroidism after radiotherapy has been reported with a prevalence of about 6% (Anderson 2003). The role of chemotherapy in inducing thyroid damage is debated. Incidence of hypothyroidism also depends on RT fractions delivered. Hypothyroidism may contribute to growth failure and learning disabilities in survivors. Other symptoms are fatigue, weight gain, cold intolerance, constipation, dry skin, brittle hair, and depressed mood. In some studies, most thyroid dysfunctions have been detected within 4 years after radiotherapy. Recommendations for annual screening, on a type 1 level of evidence, include a focused history for symptoms of hypothyroidism, height, weight, skin, hair, and thyroid examination, annual bone densitometry. FT4-TSH assessment should be performed every 6 months (Nandagopal 2008). The values should be maintained in the upper half of the normal range. Thyroid hormone recommended replacement is made with oral L-thyroxine once daily orally (0.05-0.1 mg), and in case of complete thyroid failure, 4-5 µg/Kg/day for children and 2-3 µg/Kg/day for adults (Corrias 2001).

Hyperthyroidism may rarely occur after irradiation for paediatric medulloblastoma. Symptoms include: heat intolerance, tachycardia, palpitations, weight loss, emotional lability, muscular weakness, and hyperphagia. Screening for hyperthyroidism consists of yearly physical examination (eyes, skin, thyroid, heart, and neurologic examination) and FT3-FT4-TSH assessment (Nandagopal 2008).

Thyroid nodules. Yearly thyroid physical examination should be performed. Periodical ultrasound examination is required, and fine needle aspiration should be considered in case of suspicious nodules (Nandagopal 2008).

Hyperprolactinemia is a frequent finding after brain irradiation and may be due to the destruction of the hypothalamus-pituitary axis or to primary hypothyroidism. It has been described in both sexes and all age groups, but it is most frequently observed in the adult females (Darzy 2009). It has only been demonstrated more than 2 years after therapy. Screening includes periodic PRL and TSH assays, and when PRL levels are higher than 50 ng/ml, a pituitary MRI should be performed. The clinical features of hyperprolactinemia in females include oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea with anovulation or infertility; in males decreased libido and sexual potency with progressive hypogonadism are observed. Galactorrhea is a less frequent finding, and rare in males.
Spontaneous resolution of the hyperprolactinemia at 5-6 years after radiotherapy is a sporadic finding, more often a standard treatment with a dopamine agonists is necessary (Bromocriptine 1.25-5 mg/day orally gradually increasing the dose, or Cabergoline 0.25-1 mg/week orally).

Central adrenal insufficiency (ACTH deficiency) is rare, but potentially life threatening. In one series it has been reported in 24% of paediatric brain cancer survivors, most of which were medulloblastoma survivors (Fossati 2009).
Symptoms include failure to thrive, anorexia, dehydratation, hypoglycemia, lethargy, and unexplained hypotension. Laboratory assessments include 8:00 a.m. cortisol dosage. Given that central adrenal insufficiency has been detected in survivors many years after the completion of therapy, an 8:00 a.m. serum cortisol level should be obtained yearly until 15 years off therapy, on a type 1 level of evidence. Further endocrinological evaluations and treatment are needed if cortisol levels are <10 µg/dl (Nandagopal 2008).
If ACTH deficiency is suspected on clinical grounds, a test of the whole axis, such as the ITT or the metyrapone test, should be performed, on a type 1 level of evidence (Toogood 2004).

Osteopenia/osteoporosis can be caused by both steroid therapy and craniospinal irradiation, while GH deficiency does not seem to be an important factor (Anderson 2003). Bone density evaluation by DEXA or quantitative CT should be performed during follow-up, starting at 2 years after completion of cancer therapy. The patient should be referred to a specialist if osteoporosis is suspected (T score ≥2.5 DS or history of multiple fractures) (Nandagopal 2008).
Calcium and Vitamin D supplementation and optimisation of endocrine replacements are important as well, on a type 3 level of evidence (Krishnamoorthy 2004).

Overweight/obesity, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome. Cranial RT but also the heavy metals carboplatin and cisplatin often used in medulloblastoma may cause dyslipidemia. Concurrent GH deficiency and hypothyroidism may exacerbate overweight/obesity. The survivors’ follow-up includes annual assessments of blood pressure and body mass index. Fasting blood glucose, serum insulin, and lipidic profile should be screened every 2 years in patients who are overweight or obese, and every 5 years in normal weight patients. Other co-morbid conditions such as dylipidemia, hypertension, glucose intolerance, diabetes mellitus, hyperinsulinism, and insulin resistance should be monitored. Counselling for dietary modification, exercise, and weight loss should be given while a pharmacologic intervention should be considered in patients unresponsive to dietary and lifestyle modifications (Nandagopal 2008).

Neurocognitive outcome. Many survivors of medulloblastoma treatment experience long-term cognitive, neuropsychological, and academic impairments: cognitive impairments are frequent, and specific neuropsychological deficits affect the later cognitive development and the acquisition of new skills. The ultimate neurocognitive outcome is very complex and depends on a number of factors that interact in unpredictable ways.
The functional neurocognitive domains that are affected the most by treatment are: attention, executive functioning, processing speed, working memory, and learning, which adversely influence academic performance (Palmer 2007; Palmer 2008; Mabbott 2008). It is well established, on a type C basis, that children with medulloblastoma demonstrate declines in neurocognitive functioning and academic achievement over time. Because of deficits in these important functional domains, survivors experience declines in Intelligence Quotient (IQ) and academic achievement relative to their same-age peers. This does not mean that the cognitive growth rate is arrested or declines as in dementia, but it is reduced compared with same-age peers. Therefore, as the time since treatment increases, the gap in abilities between the survivors and the general population increases. This gap challenges some survivors in problem solving, academic achievement, independent living, and the quality of life in general.
In some children the IQ drops by as much as 3 to 4 points per year: brain calcifications, leucoencephalopathy, and reductions in white matter volume correlate with these declines in neurocognitive functioning (Palmer 2007).
The late neurocognitive effects can be caused by any of the treatment modalities; the main risk factors for their onset include:

  1. (younger) age at diagnosis and treatment: the earlier the brain damage, the worse and more generalised is the cognitive impairment. The brain damage caused by the tumour site, the presence of clinical complications and oncological treatment arrests the physiological development of brain structures and functions, affecting or halting the processes leading to new skills acquisition, with a negative domino effect on cognitive development (Mulhern 2001): there is an evidence on a type C basis;
  2. tumour site: tumour invasion of normal brain/compression of the tumour on the brain parenchyma and trauma from surgical resection. Because of their location in or near the cerebellum, cognitive and neuropsychological difficulties may arise from the primary impact of the tumour and surgical resection due to damage to this structure. The cerebellum plays an important role in higher cognitive functions given the reciprocal connections with the frontal lobe, and there can be long-term deficits in speech, language and communication, executive function, visuospatial ability, and behavioural regulation (Reeves 2006; Palmer 2008);
  3. clinical complications: hydrocephalus. Posterior cranial fossa tumours, cerebellar and pontine tumours can cause an obstruction of the 4th ventricle with ensuing hydrocephalus. This, in turn, may cause a generalised damage and nonspecific cognitive problems added to the structural and functional damage that is specifically related to the tumour site (Hardy 2008);
  4. cranial radiation therapy (CRT): the most prominent deficits for children with brain tumours are associated with cranial radiotherapy; patients receiving CRT are significantly more likely to have school problems than other brain tumour patients and experience a pervasive decline in knowledge acquisition. Poor intellectual outcome is associated with higher radiation doses and a larger volume as well as younger age at radiotherapy. The effects of CRT begin to clinically impact cognitive functioning at about 1 year post-treatment and show a continuing pattern of decline over time. An analysis of longitudinal changes in IQ scores over time revealed that younger patients experience an immediate decline that continued over time, while older patients experienced a delay in decline for about 2 years (Mulhern 1998; Jain 2008);
  5. sensory and motor impairments: such deficits heavily impact on the later learning experience and the natural cognitive decline (Palmer 2007).

In general, two processes could account for the cognitive decline experienced by patients with medulloblastoma. Children who show a decline in their standardised IQ scores could be losing previously acquired information as evidenced by a decline in raw scores. They could continue otherwise to acquire new information, but at a rate slower than expected when compared with normal same-age peers, with a decline in standard scores. A slow rate of knowledge acquisition directly affects a patient’s potential academic performance, so these survivors are at great risk of losing the ability to live independent lives. School completion is highly dependent on the achievement of basic academic skills, including reading and spelling (Palmer 2007). These skills have served as important endpoints in comprehensive studies of cognitive ability following treatment for medulloblastoma (Mulhern 2005; Palmer 2007). Patients younger than 7 years show a greater impairment in reading than patients with an older age at diagnosis. While measures of intelligence and school achievements are important to understand treatment-related changes, it is evident that changes in more basic cognitive skills, such as memory, attention and processing, may occur earlier in the cascade of events. In point of fact, attention and behaviour planning and organisation, as well as the ability to store and organise information, are critical prerequisites for knowledge acquisition. It has been speculated that in children treated for medulloblastoma the inability to acquire new information and skills at a rate comparable to healthy same-age peers may be due to deficits in underlying core abilities such as memory, attention and speed of processing.
Given these issues, targeted functional assessments should be carried out periodically, on a type C basis, in order to test for cognitive problems, if any, and start specific rehabilitation together with appropriate school support.
Besides interventions aimed at reducing the neurotoxicity to the CNS, effective intervention programmes may be considered the second line of defence against the cognitive decline following treatment. An early assessment of a child’s deficits and strengths is necessary to help parents and teachers provide proper care, support and recovery from hospitalisation. Generally, children who survive paediatric medulloblastoma are impaired, so they necessitate long-term multidisciplinary follow-up and treatment for psychological and emotional difficulties. The degree of impairment varies, however, between patients. Patients at heightened risk of developing specific cognitive deficits should be accurately screened to start intervention programmes that can include drug therapy, cognitive therapy to enhance attention through metacognitive strategies, and cognitive-behavioural strategies, along with personalised educational and support programmes (Askins 2008).
Furthermore, patients treated for medulloblastoma frequently show psychological and behavioural problems, such as inadequate social competence, withdrawal, anxiety, and depression that affect social adjustment and interpersonal skills. These emotional and behavioural disorders adversely influence their psychological functioning and quality of life.
Given the complexity and variability of these deficits, a range of rehabilitative services should be offered, including speech and language therapy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, psychotherapy, and educational remediation. Furthermore, as problems may arise at a later time, regular follow-ups are needed to monitor the children’s cognitive development and school progress.

7.2 Neurosensorial late effects

Auditory deficits are the most frequent late effects and are associated both with cochlear irradiation during boost to posterior fossa and cisplatin use (Packer 2003b). Hypoacusia can be monolateral or bilateral and so severe as to require hearing aid. Audiometry is, therefore, constantly required during treatment and with regular follow-up examinations to provide early correction of deficits.
Visual defects relating to acuity are mainly due to intracranial hypertension, while nystagmus and diplopia may be found secondary to mass effects and tumour removal. Other defects, such as dysmetria and ataxia, are frequently ameliorated by early re-education.

7.2.2 Orthopaedic late-effects

Craniospinal irradiation can be a concomitant cause of kyphosis and of vertebral demineralisation. This may also be caused by steroidal therapy, GH, and gonadotropin deficits, or altered food intake. Vertebral growth is obviously altered by irradiation and not helped by growth hormone replacement (Odame 2006).

7.3 Second tumours

The use of both irradiation and chemotherapy (alkylating agents, nitrosureas, etoposide) contributes to the occurrence of secondary tumours (Goldstein 1997). Meningiomas, cavernomas, and glial tumours are found in radiation fields as long as thirty years after treatment, and justify the prolongation of follow-up.
Secondary tumours due to treatment have to be distinguished from those arising in cancer predisposition syndromes like Gorlin’s and Turcot’s syndromes.


Relapses of medulloblastoma occur and more than half of these relapses have a component of disseminated disease. Relapses occur in nearly 75% of paediatric cases within 2 years. Relapse is most commonly diagnosed by neuroimaging; occasionally, clinical progression precedes neuroimaging findings. There are no formal clinical trials that address the specific question of the frequency of MRI use for radiographic surveillance (Minn 2001).
Patients enrolled in study protocols have a formal timetable for imaging, although the intervals between MRI scans become arbitrary when a patient has completed the therapy. We generally recommend imaging of the brain and spine every 3 months for the first 2 years. Later, MRI of the brain should be performed every 4 months for the third year, every 6 months until the fifth year and then annually, on a type C basis. Evaluation of the spine is generally required only in case of clinical suspicion.
Part of follow-up is all the clinical, radiological, and biochemical examinations, together with tailored tests for neuro-functional capabilities as detailed in the «late effects» section.

8.1 Treatment at relapse

The approach to treatment of a patient with relapsing medulloblastoma varies and depends on a range of factors.
First, the age of the patient is important when deciding to use radiation therapy, which can cause severe neurological morbidity in children younger than 3 years old and is therefore avoided at diagnosis in this age category standard-risk patients, but can be used at relapse as retrieval, combined with various chemotherapy schedules mostly with myeloablative dosages (Ridola 2007). This option, which has been used with some success, is to be considered investigational only and it is not successful in older children that have already received craniospinal irradiation. In this age group, in fact, approximately 20% of patients who experience relapse after irradiation cannot be cured by salvage therapy, barring very rare exceptions (<5% of those who experience relapse) (Bouffet 1998; Massimino 2009; Pizer 2011).
In older children who received craniospinal radiation as part of their initial therapy, re-operation, followed by focal radiation with conformal techniques or proton beam, might be an option for solitary recurrences and should be considered on a case-by-case basis (Saran 2008). However, in these circumstances, the CSF must be examined before starting therapy to assess the extent of dissemination.
Trials of idarubicin, taxol, topotecan, temozolomide, and irinotecan recorded few responses with nearly all patients developing further tumour progression (Kadota 1999; Hurwitz 2001; Dreyer 2003; Nicholson 2007; Bomgaars 2007; Massimino 2013a; Cefalo 2014). Another approach under investigation is the use of a low-dose chemotherapy regimen called “metronomic” therapy. Several groups have reported the feasibility of this approach for treating paediatric brain tumours in case series (Kieran 2005) and a formalised clinical trial is ongoing in Europe (Peyrl 2012). The main concerns about this approach are the immediate haematological toxicities and the long-term risk of secondary malignancies. The open clinical trial will probably validate this option.
Although “druggable” mutations and copy number variations are present in the genomic landscape of this disease, the only targeted therapy that has been evaluated in the clinic includes the Smoothened (SMO) inhibitors. In a phase I (No. 33 children, SHH medulloblastoma 7) followed by a phase II trial (No. 12; all SHH medulloblastoma) of GDC0449 (PBTC-025 and -032), only one patient had a defined protocol sustained objective response, as compared to 3 of 20 adults with recurrent SHH medulloblastoma (PBTC-025B, phase II) whose tumours exhibited objective response to this agent. In a phase I trial of LDE225, Shou et al. reported that 6/50 patients with recurrent medulloblastoma who had a five-gene signature identifying the SHH pathway experienced a sustained response to the agent (Gajjar 2013; Shou 2015). It is now apparent that SMO inhibitors work only in the context of PTCH or SMO mutations (more common in adult medulloblastoma) and not at all if SHH pathway activation is due to mutations in downstream targets, including SUFU, GLI2, or MYCN (as seen in childhood tumours). Responses to SMO inhibitors, even when they occur, are transient due to development of acquired resistance (Yauch 2009;  Metcalfe 2013). It is, therefore, unlikely that single agent therapy is likely to provide sustained benefit.
However, the paucity and modest efficacy of currently available novel targeted agents for recurrent medulloblastoma is a sobering fact and has to be balanced against the risk of long-term toxicity due to these agents, especially in young children.


Albright AL, Sposto R, Holmes E, Zeltzer PM, Finlay JL, Wisoff JH et al. Correlation of neurosurgical subspecialization with outcomes in children with malignant brain tumors. Neurosurgery 2000; 47(4): 885-7. [Medline]

Amlashi SF, Riffaud L, Brassier G, Morandi X. Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome: relation with desmoplastic medulloblastoma in infancy. A population-based study and review of the literature. Cancer 2003; 98(3): 618-24. [Medline]

Anderson NE. Late complications in childhood central nervous system tumour survivors. Curr Opin Neurol 2003; 16(6): 677-83. [Medline]

Archer TC, Weeraratne SD, Pomeroy SL. Hedgehog-GLI pathway in medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30(17): 2154-6. [Medline]

Askins MA, Moore BD 3rd. Preventing neurocognitive late effects in childhood cancer survivors. J Child Neurol 2008; 23(10): 1160-71. [Medline]

Ater JL, van Eys J, Woo SY, Moore B 3rd, Copeland DR, Bruner J. MOPP chemotherapy without irradiation as primary postsurgical therapy for brain tumors in infants and young children. J Neurooncol 1997; 32(3): 243-52. [Medline]

Bailey CC, Gnekow A, Wellek S, Jones M, Round C, Brown J et al. Prospective randomised trial of chemotherapy given before radiotherapy in childhood medulloblastoma. International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) and the (German) Society of Paediatric Oncology (GPO): SIOP II. Med Pediatr Oncol 1995; 25(3): 166-78. [Medline]

Baldwin RT, Preston-Martin S. Epidemiology of brain tumors in childhood – a review. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2004; 199(2): 118-31. [Medline]

Bomgaars LR, Bernstein M, Krailo M, Kadota R, Das S, Chen Z et al. Phase II trial of irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors: a Children’s Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(29): 4622-7. [Medline]

Bouffet E, Doz F, Demaille MC, Tron P, Roche H, Plantaz D et al. Improving survival in recurrent medulloblastoma: earlier detection, better treatment or still an impasse? Br J Cancer 1998; 77(8): 1321-6. [Medline]

Buhring U, Strayle-Batra M, Freudenstein D, Scheel-Walter HG, Küker W. MRI features of primary, secondary and metastatic medulloblastoma. Eur Radiol 2002; 12(6): 1342-8. [Medline]

Bull KS, Spoudeas HA, Yadegarfar G, Kennedy CR; CCLG. Reduction of health status 7 years after addition of chemotherapy to craniospinal irradiation for medulloblastoma: a follow-up study in PNET 3 trial survivors on behalf of the CCLG (formerly UKCCSG). J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(27): 4239-45. [Medline]

Cefalo G, Massimino M, Ruggiero A, Barone G, Ridola V, Spreafico F et al. Temozolomide is an active agent in children with recurrent medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor: an Italian multi-institutional phase II trial. Neuro Oncol 2014; 16(5): 748-53. [Medline]

Chang CH, Housepian EM, Herbert C Jr. An operative staging system and a megavoltage radiotherapeutic technic for cerebellar medulloblastomas. Radiology 1969; 93(6): 1351-9. [Medline]

Chevignard; in press.

Chi SN, Gardner SL, Levy AS, Knopp EA, Miller DC, Wisoff JH et al. Feasibility and response to induction chemotherapy intensified with high-dose methotrexate for young children with newly diagnosed high-risk disseminated medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(24): 4881-7. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(12): 2877. [Medline]

Cordier S, Lefeuvre B, Filippini G, Peris-Bonet R, Farinotti M, Lovicu G et al. Parental occupation, occupational exposure to solvents and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk of childhood brain tumors (Italy, France, Spain). Cancer Causes Control 1997; 8(5): 688-97. Erratum in: Cancer Causes Control 1997; 8(6): 934.  [Medline]

Corrias A, Einaudi S, Ricardi U, Sandri A, Besenzon L, Altare F et al. Thyroid diseases in patients treated during pre-puberty for medulloblastoma with different radiotherapic protocols. J Endocrinol Invest 2001; 24(6): 387-92. [Medline]

Dallorso S, Dini G, Ladenstein R, Cama A, Milanaccio C, Barra S et al. Evolving role of myeloablative chemotherapy in the treatment of childhood brain tumours. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35 Suppl 1: S31-4. [Medline]

Darzy KH, Shalet SM. Hypopituitarism following Radiotherapy Revisited. Endocr Dev 2009; 15: 1-24. [Medline]

Dhodapkar K, Dunkel IJ, Gardner S, Sapp M, Thoron L, Finlay J. Preliminary results of dose intensive pre-irradiation chemotherapy in patients older than 10 years of age with high risk medulloblastoma and supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Med Pediatr Oncol 2002; 38(1): 47-8. [Medline]

Dietrich M, Block G, Pogoda JM, Buffler P, Hecht S, Preston-Martin S. A review: dietary and endogenously formed N-nitroso compounds and risk of childhood brain tumors. Cancer Causes Control 2005; 16(6): 619-35. [Medline]

Dreyer ZE, Kadota RP, Stewart CF, Friedman HS, Mahoney DH, Kun LE et al. Phase 2 study of idarubicin in pediatric brain tumors: Pediatric Oncology Group study POG 9237. Neuro Oncol 2003; 5(4): 261-7. [Medline]

Duffner PK, Horowitz ME, Krischer JP, Friedman HS, Burger PC, Cohen ME et al. Postoperative chemotherapy and delayed radiation in children less than three years of age with malignant brain tumors. N Engl J Med 1993; 328(24): 1725-31. [Medline]

Duffner PK, Horowitz ME, Krischer JP, Burger PC, Cohen ME, Sanford RA et al. The treatment of malignant brain tumors in infants and very young children: an update of the Pediatric Oncology Group experience. Neuro Oncol 1999; 1(2): 152-61. [Medline]

Duffner P. Brain tumors in children under 1 year of age: emphasis on the relationship of prognostic factors. Childs Nerv Syst 2003; 19(5-6): 315. [Medline]

Dufour C, Kieffer V, Varlet P, Raquin MA, Dhermain F, Puget S et al. Tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue in children with newly diagnosed high-risk medulloblastoma or supratentorial primitive neuro-ectodermic tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014; 61(8): 1398-402. [Medline]

Eberhart CG, Kepner JL, Goldthwaite PT, Kun LE, Duffner PK, Friedman HS et al. Histopathologic grading of medulloblastomas: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. Cancer 2002; 94(2): 552-60. [Medline]

Ellison DW, Dalton J, Kocak M, Nicholson SL, Fraga C, Neale G et al. Medulloblastoma: clinicopathological correlates of SHH, WNT, and non-SHH/WNT molecular subgroups. Acta Neuropathol 2011; 121(3): 381-96. [Medline]

Evans AE, Jenkin RD, Sposto R, Ortega JA, Wilson CB, Wara W et al. The treatment of medulloblastoma. Results of a prospective randomized trial of radiation therapy with and without CCNU, vincristine, and prednisone. J Neurosurg 1990; 72(4): 572-82. [Medline]

Fear NT, Roman E, Ansell P, Bull D. Malignant neoplasms of the brain during childhood: the role of prenatal and neonatal factors (United Kingdom). Cancer Causes Control 2001; 12(5): 443-9. [Medline]

Fossati P, Ricardi U, Orecchia R. Pediatric medulloblastoma: toxicity of current treatment and potential role of protontherapy. Cancer Treat Rev 2009; 35(1): 79-96. [Medline]

Gajjar A, Fouladi M, Walter AW, Thompson SJ, Reardon DA, Merchant TE et al. Comparison of lumbar and shunt cerebrospinal fluid specimens for cytologic detection of leptomeningeal disease in pediatric patients with brain tumors. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17(6): 1825-8. [Medline]

Gajjar A, Chintagumpala M, Ashley D, Kellie S, Kun LE, Merchant TE et al. Risk-adapted craniospinal radiotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue in children with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma (St Jude Medulloblastoma-96): long-term results from a prospective, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7(10): 813-20. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol 2006; 7(10): 797. [Medline]

Gajjar A, Stewart CF, Ellison DW, Kaste S, Kun LE, Packer RJ et al. Phase I study of vismodegib in children with recurrent or refractory medulloblastoma: a pediatric brain tumor consortium study. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19(22): 6305-12. [Medline]

Gajjar AJ, Robinson GW. Medulloblastoma-translating discoveries from the bench to the bedside. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014; 11(12): 714-22. [Medline]

Gajjar AJ, Finlay JL. The management of children and adolescents with medulloblastoma in low and middle income countries. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015; 62(4): 549-50. [Medline]

Gandola L, Massimino M, Cefalo G, Solero C, Spreafico F, Pecori E et al. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in the Milan strategy for metastatic medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27(4): 566-71. [Medline]

Garrè ML, Cama A, Milanaccio C, Gandola L, Massimino M, Dallorso S. New concepts in the treatment of brain tumors in very young children. Expert Rev Neurother 2006; 6(4): 489-500. [Medline]

Garrè ML, Cama A, Bagnasco F, Morana G, Giangaspero F, Brisigotti M et al. Medulloblastoma variants: age-dependent occurrence and relation to Gorlin syndrome – a new clinical perspective. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15(7): 2463-71. [Medline]

Gatta G, Zigon G, Capocaccia R, Coebergh JW, Desandes E, Kaatsch P et al. Survival of European children and young adults with cancer diagnosed 1995-2002. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45(6): 992-1005. [Medline]

Gatta G, Botta L, Rossi S, Aareleid T, Bielska-Lasota M, Clavel J et al. Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: results of EUROCARE-5 – a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15(1): 35-47. [Medline]

Gentet JC, Bouffet E, Doz F, Tron P, Roche H, Thyss A et al. Preirradiation chemotherapy including “eight drugs in 1 day” regimen and high-dose methotrexate in childhood medulloblastoma: results of the M7 French Cooperative Study. J Neurosurg 1995; 82(4): 608-14. [Medline]

Geyer JR, Sposto R, Jennings M, Boyett JM, Axtell RA, Breiger D et al. Multiagent chemotherapy and deferred radiotherapy in infants with malignant brain tumors: a report from the Children’s Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(30): 7621-31. [Medline]

Growth Hormone Research Society – GHRS. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in childhood and adolescence: summary statement of the GH Research Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85(11): 3990-3. [Medline]

Giangaspero F, Eberhart CG, Ellison DW, Haapasalo H, Pietsch T, Wiestler OD. Medulloblastoma. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavanee WK (eds). WHO Classification of Tumours of the Nervous System. Lyon, IARC, 2007.

Gibson P, Tong Y, Robinson G, Thompson MC, Currle DS, Eden C et al. Subtypes of medulloblastoma have distinct developmental origins. Nature 2010; 468/7327): 1095-9. [Medline]

Gilbertson RJ. Medulloblastoma: signalling a change in treatment. Lancet Oncol 2004; 5(4): 209-18. [Medline]

Gilbertson RJ, Ellison DW. The origins of medulloblastoma subtypes. Annu Rev Pathol 2008; 3: 341-65. [Medline]

Goldstein AM, Yuen J, Tucker MA. Second cancers after medulloblastoma: population-based results from the United States and Sweden. Cancer Causes Control 1997; 8(6): 865-71. [Medline]

Grill J, Sainte-Rose C, Jouvet A, Gentet JC, Lejars O, Frappaz D et al. Treatment of medulloblastoma with postoperative chemotherapy alone: an SFOP prospective trial in young children. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6(8): 573-80. [Medline]

Halperin EC, Constine LS, Tarbell NJ, Kun LE. Pediatric Radiation Oncology. 2nd edition. New York, Raven Press, 1994.

Harder T, Plagemann A, Harder A. Birth weight and subsequent risk of childhood primary brain tumors: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2008; 168(4): 366-73. [Medline]

Harding NJ, Birch JM, Hepworth SJ, McKinney PA. Infectious exposure in the first year of life and risk of central nervous system tumors in children: analysis of day care, social contact, and overcrowding. Cancer Causes Control 2009; 20(2): 129-36. [Medline]

Hardy KK, Bonner MJ, Willard VW, Watral MA, Gururangan S. Hydrocephalus as a possible additional contributor to cognitive outcome in survivors of pediatric medulloblastoma. Psychooncology 2008; 17(11): 1157-61. [Medline]

Heikens J, Michiels EM, Behrendt H, Endert E, Bakker PJ, Fliers E. Long-term neuro-endocrine sequelae after treatment for childhood medulloblastoma. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34(10): 1592-7. [Medline]

Hurwitz CA, Strauss LC, Kepner J, Kretschmar C, Harris MB, Friedman H et al. Paclitaxel for the treatment of progressive or recurrent childhood brain tumors: a pediatric oncology phase II study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2001; 23(5): 277-81. [Medline]

Jain N, Krull KR, Brouwers P, Chintagumpala MM, Woo SY. Neuropsychological outcome following intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008; 51(2): 275-9. [Medline]

Jones DT, Jäger N, Kool M, Zichner T, Hutter B, Sultan M et al. Dissecting the genomic complexity underlying medulloblastoma. Nature 2012; 488(7409): 100-5. [Medline]

Kadota RP, Stewart CF, Horn M, Kuttesch JF Jr, Burger PC, Kepner JL et al. Topotecan for the treatment of recurrent or progressive central nervous system tumors – a pediatric oncology group phase II study. J Neurooncol 1999; 43(1): 43-7. [Medline]

Kalifa C, Valteau D, Pizer B, Vassal G, Grill J, Hartmann O. High-dose chemotherapy in childhood brain tumours. Childs Nerv Syst 1999; 15(10): 498-505. [Medline]

Kennedy C, Bull K, Chevignard M, Culliford D, Dörr HG, Doz F et al; PNET4 study group of the Brain Tumour Group of The European branch of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP-E). Quality of survival and growth in children and young adults in the PNET4 European controlled trial of hyperfractionated versus conventional radiation therapy for standard-risk medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 88(2): 292-300. [Medline]

Kieran MW, Turner CD, Rubin JB, Chi SN, Zimmerman MA, Chordas C et al. A feasibility trial of antiangiogenic (metronomic) chemotherapy in pediatric patients with recurrent or progressive cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2005; 27(11): 573-81. [Medline]

Kool M, Korshunov A, Remke M, Jones DT, Schlanstein M, Northcott PA et al. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: an international meta-analysis of transcriptome, genetic aberrations, and clinical data of WNT, SHH, Group 3, and Group 4 medulloblastomas. Acta Neuropathol 2012; 123(4): 473-84. [Medline]

Kool M, Jones DT, Jäger N, Northcott PA, Pugh TJ, Hovestadt V et al. Genome sequencing of SHH medulloblastoma predicts genotype-related response to smoothened inhibition. Cancer Cell 2014; 25(3): 393-405. [Medline]

Kortmann RD, Kuhl J, Timmermann B, Mittler U, Urban C, Budach V et al. Postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy as compared to immediate radiotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in the treatment of medulloblastoma in childhood: results of the German prospective randomized trial HIT ‘91. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 46(2): 269-79. [Medline]

Krishnamoorthy P, Freeman C, Bernstein ML, Lawrence S, Rodd C. Osteopenia in children who have undergone posterior fossa or craniospinal irradiation for brain tumors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004; 158(5): 491-6. [Medline]

Lannering B, Rutkowski S, Doz F, Pizer B, Gustafsson G, Navajas A et al. Hyperfractionated versus conventional radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy in standard-risk medulloblastoma: results from the randomized multicenter HIT-SIOP PNET 4 trial. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30(26): 3187-93. [Medline]

Li P, McLaughlin J, Infante-Rivard C. Maternal occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields and the risk of brain cancer in the offspring. Cancer Causes Control 2009; 20(6): 945-55. [Medline]

Mabbott DJ, Penkman L, Witol A, Strother D, Bouffet E. Core neurocognitive functions in children treated for posterior fossa tumors. Neuropsychology 2008; 22(2): 159-68. [Medline]

Massimino M, Gandola L, Spreafico F, Biassoni V, Luksch R, Collini P et al. No salvage using high-dose chemotherapy plus/minus reirradiation for relapsing previously irradiated medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 73(5): 1358-63. [Medline]

Massimino M, Casanova M, Polastri D, Biassoni V, Modena P, Pecori E et al. Relapse in medulloblastoma: what can be done after abandoning high-dose chemotherapy? A mono-institutional experience. Childs Nerv Syst 2013a Apr 18. [Epub ahead of print]. [Medline]

Massimino M, Antonelli M, Gandola L, Miceli R, Pollo B, Biassoni V et al. Histological variants of medulloblastoma are the most powerful clinical prognostic indicators. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013b; 60(2): 210-6. [Medline]

McManamy CS, Lamont JM, Taylor RE, Cole M, Pearson AD, Clifford SC et al. Morphophenotypic variation predicts clinical behavior in childhood non-desmoplastic medulloblastomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2003; 62(6): 627-32. [Medline]

McManamy CS, Pears J, Weston CL, Hanzely Z, Ironside JW, Taylor RE et al. Nodule formation and desmoplasia in medulloblastomas-defining the nodular/desmoplastic variant and its biological behavior. Brain Pathol 2007; 17(2): 151-64. [Medline]

Metcalfe C, Alicke B, Crow A, Lamoureux M, Dijkgraaf GJ, Peale F et al. PTEN loss mitigates the response of medulloblastoma to Hedgehog pathway inhibition. Cancer Res 2013; 73(23): 7034-42. [Medline]

Min HS, Lee JY, Kim SK, Park SH. Genetic grouping of medulloblastomas by representative markers in pathologic diagnosis. Transl Oncol 2013; 6(3): 265-72. [Medline]

Minn AY, Pollock BH, Garzarella L, Dahl GV, Kun LE, Ducore JM et al. Surveillance neuroimaging to detect relapse in childhood brain tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19(21): 4135-40. [Medline]

Morfouace M, Shelat A, Jacus M, Freeman BB 3rd, Turner D, Robinson S et al. Pemetrexed and gemcitabine as combination therapy for the treatment of Group3 medulloblastoma. Cancer Cell 2014; 25(4): 516-29. [Medline]

Mulhern RK, Kepner JL, Thomas PR, Armstrong FD, Friedman HS, Kun LE. Neuropsychologic functioning of survivors of childhood medulloblastoma randomized to receive conventional or reduced-dose craniospinal irradiation: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16(5): 1723-8. [Medline]

Mulhern RK, Palmer SL, Reddick WE, Glass JO, Kun LE, Taylor J et al. Risks of young age for selected neurocognitive deficits in medulloblastoma are associated with white matter loss. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19(2): 472-9. [Medline]

Mulhern RK, Palmer SL, Merchant TE, Wallace D, Kocak M, Brouwers P et al. Neurocognitive consequences of risk-adapted therapy for childhood medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(24): 5511-9. [Medline]

Nandagopal R, Laverdière C, Mulrooney D, Hudson MM, Meacham L. Endocrine late effects of childhood cancer therapy: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Horm Res 2008; 69(2): 65-74. [Medline]

Nicholson HS, Kretschmar CS, Krailo M, Bernstein M, Kadota R, Fort D et al. Phase 2 study of temozolomide in children and adolescents with recurrent central nervous system tumors: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Cancer 2007; 110(7): 1542-50. [Medline]

Northcott PA, Jones DT, Kool M, Robinson GW, Gilbertson RJ, Cho YJ et al. Medulloblastomics: the end of the beginning. Nat Rev Cancer 2012; 12(12): 818-34. [Medline]

Odame I, Duckworth J, Talsma D, Beaumont L, Furlong W, Webber C et al. Osteopenia, physical activity and health-related quality of life in survivors of brain tumors treated in childhood. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2006; 46(3): 357-62. [Medline]

Packer RJ, Siegel KR, Sutton LN, Evans AE, D’Angio G, Rorke LB et al. Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with poor-risk medulloblastoma: a preliminary report. Ann Neurol 1988; 24(4): 503-8. [Medline]

Packer RJ. Chemotherapy for medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the posterior fossa. Ann Neurol 1990; 28(6): 823-8. [Medline]

Packer RJ, Rood BR, MacDonald TJ. Medulloblastoma: present concepts of stratification into risk groups. Pediatr Neurosurg 2003a; 39(2): 60-7. [Medline]

Packer RJ, Gurney JG, Punyko JA, Donaldson SS, Inskip PD, Stovall M et al. Long-term neurologic and neurosensory sequelae in adult survivors of a childhood brain tumor: childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol 2003b; 21(17): 3255-61. [Medline]

Packer RJ, Gajjar A, Vezina G, Rorke-Adams L, Burger PC, Robertson PL et al. Phase III study of craniospinal radiation therapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed average-risk medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(25): 4202-8. [Medline]

Packer RJ, Zhou T, Holmes E, Vezina G, Gajjar A. Survival and secondary tumors in children with medulloblastoma receiving radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy: results of Children’s Oncology Group trial A9961. Neuro Oncol 2013; 15(1): 97-103. [Medline]

Palmer SL, Reddick WE, Gajjar A. Understanding the cognitive impact on children who are treated for medulloblastoma. J Pediatr Psychol 2007; 32(9): 1040-9. [Medline]

Palmer SL. Neurodevelopmental impact on children treated for medulloblastoma: a review and proposed conceptual model. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2008; 14(3): 203-10. [Medline]

Pei Y, Moore CE, Wang J, Tewari AK, Eroshkin A, Cho YJ et al. An animal model of MYC-driven medulloblastoma. Cancer Cell 2012; 21(2): 155-67. [Medline]

Peris-Bonet R, Martinez-Garcia C, Lacour B, Petrovich S, Giner-Ripoll B, Navajas A et al. Childhood central nervous system tumours – incidence and survival in Europe (1978-1997): report from Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42(13): 2064-80. [Medline]

Peyrl A, Chocholous M, Kieran MW, Azizi AA, Prucker C, Czech T et al. Antiangiogenic metronomic therapy for children with recurrent embryonal brain tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 59(3): 511-7. [Medline]

Pizer B, Donachie PH, Robinson K, Taylor RE, Michalski A, Punt J et al. Treatment of recurrent central nervous system primitive neuroectodermal tumours in children and adolescents: results of a Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group study. Eur J Cancer 2011; 47(9): 1389-97. [Medline]

Pogoda JM, Preston-Martin S, Howe G, Lubin F, Mueller BA, Holly EA et al. An international case-control study of maternal diet during pregnancy and childhood brain tumor risk: a histology-specific analysis by food group. Ann Epidemiol 2009; 19(3): 148-60. [Medline]

RARECAREnet. Avaialble at:

Reeves CB, Palmer SL, Reddick WE, Merchant TE, Buchanan GM, Gajjar A et al. Attention and memory functioning among pediatric patients with medulloblastoma. J Pediatr Psychol 2006; 31(3): 272-80. [Medline]

Ridola V, Grill J, Doz F, Gentet JC, Frappaz D, Raquin MA et al. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue followed by posterior fossa irradiation for local medulloblastoma recurrence or progression after conventional chemotherapy. Cancer 2007; 110(1): 156-63. [Medline]

Ries L, Smith M, Gurney JG, Linet M, Tamra T, Young L et al (eds). Cancer incidence and survival among children and adolescents: United States SEER program 1975-1995. National Cancer Institute, SEER program, Publication No. 99-4649. Bethesda, MD, NHI 1999.

Robertson PL, Muraszko KM, Holmes EJ, Sposto R, Packer RJ, Gajjar A et al. Incidence and severity of postoperative cerebellar mutism syndrome in children with medulloblastoma: a prospective study by the Children’s Oncology Group. J Neurosurg 2006; 105(6) Suppl: 444-51. [Medline]

Rose SR. Endocrinopathies in childhood cancer survivors. The endocrinologist 2003; 13: 488-95.

Rosso AL, Hovinga ME, Rorke-Adams LB, Spector LG, Bunin GR; Children’s Oncology Group. A case-control study of childhood brain tumors and fathers’ hobbies: a Children’s Oncology Group study. Cancer Causes Control 2008; 19(10): 1201-7. [Medline]

Rutkowski S, Bode U, Deinlein F, Ottensmeier H, Warmuth-Metz M, Soerensen N et al. Treatment of early childhood medulloblastoma by postoperative chemotherapy alone. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(10): 978-86. [Medline]

Rutkowski S, Gerber NU, von Hoff K, Gnekow A, Bode U, Graf N et al. Treatment of early childhood medulloblastoma by postoperative chemotherapy and deferred radiotherapy. Neuro Oncol 2009; 11(2): 201-10. [Medline]

Rutkowski S, von Hoff K, Emser A, Zwiener I, Pietsch T, Figarella-Branger D et al. Survival and prognostic factors of early childhood medulloblastoma: an international meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28(33): 4961-8. [Medline]

Rutter MM, Rose SR. Long-term endocrine sequelae of childhood cancer. Curr Opin Pediatr 2007; 19(4): 480-7. [Medline]

Salaroli R, Ronchi A, Buttarelli FR, Cortesi F, Marchese V, Della Bella E et al. Wnt activation affects proliferation, invasiveness and radiosensitivity in medulloblastoma. J Neurooncol 2015; 121(1): 119-27. [Medline]

Saran F, Baumert BG, Creak AL, Warrington AP, Ashley S, Traish D et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of recurrent or residual medulloblastoma/PNET. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008; 50(3): 554-60. [Medline]

Shih DJ, Northcott PA, Remke M, Korshunov A, Ramaswamy V, Kool M et al. Cytogenetic prognostication within medulloblastoma subgroups. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32(9): 886-96. [Medline]

Shim YK, Mlynarek SP, van Wijngaarden E. Parental exposure to pesticides and childhood brain cancer: U.S. Atlantic coast childhood brain cancer study. Environ Health Perspect 2009; 117(6): 1002-6. [Medline]

Shou Y, Robinson DM, Amakye DD, Rose KL, Cho YJ, Ligon KL et al. A five-gene hedgehog signature developed as a patient preselection tool for hedgehog inhibitor therapy in medulloblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21(3): 585-93. [Medline]

Sklar CA, Mertens AC, Mitby P, Occhiogrosso G, Qin J, Heller G et al. Risk of disease recurrence and second neoplasms in survivors of childhood cancer treated with growth hormone: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87(7): 3136-41. [Medline]

Strother D, Ashley D, Kellie SJ, Patel A, Jones-Wallace D, Thompson S et al. Feasibility of four consecutive high-dose chemotherapy cycles with stem-cell rescue for patients with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma or supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor after craniospinal radiotherapy: results of a collaborative study. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19(10): 2696-704. [Medline]

Tait DM, Thornton-Jones H, Bloom HJ, Lemerle J, Morris-Jones P. Adjuvant chemotherapy for medulloblastoma: the first multi-centre control trial of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP I). Eur J Cancer 1990; 26(4): 464-9. [Medline]

Taylor RE, Bailey CC, Robinson KJ, Weston CL, Walker DA, Ellison D et al. Outcome for patients with metastatic (M2-3) medulloblastoma treated with SIOP/UKCCSG PNET-3 chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41(5): 727-34. [Medline]

Taylor MD, Northcott PA, Korshunov A, Remke M, Cho YJ, Clifford SC et al. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol 2012; 123(4): 465-72. [Medline]

Toogood AA. Endocrine consequences of brain irradiation. Growth Horm IGF Res 2004; 14 Suppl A: S118-24. [Medline]

UKCCSI – UK Childhood Cancer Study Investigators. Exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields and the risk of childhood cancer. UK Childhood Cancer Study Investigators. Lancet 1999; 354(9194): 1925-31. [Medline]

Yauch RL, Dijkgraaf GJ, Alicke B, Januario T, Ahn CP, Holcomb T et al. Smoothened mutation confers resistance to a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor in medulloblastoma. Science 2009; 326(5952): 572-4. [Medline]

Verlooy J, Mosseri V, Bracard S, Tubiana AL, Kalifa C, Pichon F et al. Treatment of high risk medulloblastomas in children above the age of 3 years: a SFOP study. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42(17): 3004-14. [Medline]

Villani A, Malkin D, Tabori U. Syndromes predisposing to pediatric central nervous system tumors: lessons learned and new promises. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2012; 12(2): 153-64. [Medline]

Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM, Finlay JL, Albright AL, Rorke LB, Milstein JM et al. Metastasis stage, adjuvant treatment, and residual tumor are prognostic factors for medulloblastoma in children: conclusions from the Children’s Cancer Group 921 randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17(3): 832-45. [Medline]

Zhukova N, Ramaswamy V, Remke M, Pfaff E, Shih DJ, Martin DC et al. Subgroup-specific prognostic implications of TP53 mutation in medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31(23): 2927-35. [Medline]


Dr. Veronica Biassoni (Author)
Fondazione IRCCS – Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (Italy)

Dr. Lorenza Gandola
Fondazione IRCCS – Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (Italy)

Dr. Maria Luisa Garrè (Author)
IRCCS Giannina Gaslini, Genoa (Italy)

Dr. Gemma Gatta
Fondazione IRCCS – Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (Italy)

Prof. Felice Giangaspero (Author)
Università La Sapienza and Istituto Neuromed Pozzilli, Rome (Italy)

Dr. Maura Massimino
(Editor and Author)
Fondazione IRCCS – Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (Italy)

Dr. Geraldina Poggi (Author)
Istituto Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini (Italy)

Prof. Stefan Rutkowski (Reviewer)
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Klinik und Poliklinik für Pädiatrische Hämatologie und Onkologie, Hamburg (Germany)